Ayn Rand Is Right About the Moochers

I keep seeing idiot conservatives raging about the poor and the unemployed being “moochers” and “takers” straight out of Ayn Rand’s novel “Atlas Shrugged.” The thing is, I’ve *read* Atlas Shrugged at least twice, and I am struck by the way the current crop of teabag congresscritters sound just like the moochers and takers from the government in Ayn’s book.

They demanded that they be taken anywhere, that they be obeyed instantly – and they never bother to think about who was actually doing the work to get them places and make their wishes come true. In other words, these moochers and takers demanded that the people make bricks without straw.

One particular scene sticks in my head. It’s a group of government officials who demand to be transported by railroad across the continent. They approach a long tunnel in the Colorado Rockies, and are informed by the engineer that because there is only one viable modern locomotive left on the entire railroad network, their train is going to be sidelined because the locomotive pulling it is a coal-fired steam engine – and it would not be safe to use that engine to travel through such a long tunnel, due to a buildup of gases.

The government moochers angrily DEMAND that they be taken through the tunnel AT ONCE. They threaten the engineer and the engine crew with firings and/or jail time. They exclaim that they paid for the ticket, therefore they MUST be taken to their destination – regardless of whether or not it’s safe. They tell the engineer that getting them through the tunnel is his problem, and that he had better solve it toot sweet or heads will roll.

The engineer and the crew do the only sensible thing: they desert the train and disappear. A loud and drunken coal shoveler tells the government officials that HE can drive the train safely through the tunnel, so he stokes the coal fire, and drives the engine into the tunnel… and, of course, the very thing the engineer predicted happens: the engine explodes, killing everyone on the train and destroying the tunnel.

Now, let’s jump to the present, in the real world in Washington, D.C. Think about this: Rand Paul earnestly telling us that giving the long-term unemployed a paltry check in the way of unemployment insurance is “disincentivizing” them to find work. He tells us that we’d actually be doing them a favor if we cut off their unemployment benefits.

How are these people to live? That’s their problem. They got themselves into this situation – they need to pull up their bootstraps and get themselves out of it. 

Same with the other mooch—er, “government officials” who shake their heads solemnly and tell us that the poor are lazy, and that if we cut off their welfare checks and take away their SNAP benefits, they’ll be much more motivated to find a job and get out of poverty, instead of lounging in that comfy government-provided hammock.

Again, how are they to find work if they end up homeless? That’s their problem, say the teabaggers in Congress.

My question to you:

In light of the above, who are the REAL moochers in this country? The poor and the unemployed, who are desperately scrabbling for the means to keep a roof over their heads and feed their families – or the smug Tea Party/Republicans in the House and the Senate, who make a 6-figure salary – and work fewer than 100 days out of the year?

Open Season on Young Black Men

Last night, George Zimmerman was found “not guilty” of the murder of Trayvon Martin. I firmly believe that if the situation was reversed, and George Zimmerman was black, he would currently be serving a life sentence in a hellhole like Pelican Bay.

But I’d like to try something different, and this is specifically aimed at those white mothers of 17 year old boys who are telling themselves this morning that justice was served, that Trayvon was a hoodlum and a thug and deserved what he got and that George Zimmerman got a fair trial and the verdict is just.

So, you hypothetical white woman (and I happen to know a specific woman in Arizona who fits the above description to a tee, including the teenaged honor student son), let’s get started, ask some questions, and set a different scene, shall we?

You’re a white woman. You have a 17 year old son. Let’s call him Terry. It’s a winter night in February, around 7p.m., and Terry asks if he can walk down to the 7-11 to get a can of his favorite soda and a bag of M&M’s before the football game starts.

You say yes. Hey – it’s a safe neighborhood, and it’s only 7p.m. So 17 year old Terry puts on his hoodie – because it’s raining out – and takes off.

Terry gets to the 7-11, buys his can of Coke and his bag of M&Ms and he’s on his way back, talking to his girlfriend on the phone, when he notices a black guy in a pickup truck following him – the guy isn’t just passing by; no, the guy has slowed down and is creeping along, pacing the your son.

So, understandably, your son gets scared – who is this guy following him?? So he turns off down a short cut and starts running, hoping he can get away. When he comes out the other end of the short cut, the guy in the truck is still there, stopped and waiting.

In the meantime, the guy has called 911 and reported an “effing punk” who is maybe “on drugs” and “up to no good.” The 911 operator tells him they’re sending a police car and asks him to stop following the kid, because they’ll handle it. The guy mutters something about how “these assholes – they always get away” and, in spite of what the 911 operator has just told him, he jumps out of his truck and runs after your son.

Now your son’s really and truly scared. He’s unsure of what to do. At this point, the guy is coming toward him — a big black guy, weighs around 200 pounds – who outweighs your son by about 60 pounds. He comes toward Terry and demands in a loud voice, “What are you doing here? Who the hell are you?” Maybe he has his right hand behind his back reaching for something (a loaded gun with a chambered round), but Terry can’t really see, because it’s dark and it’s raining.

Your son freaks out – he has no idea who this guy is, he’s full of adrenaline from fear, so he perhaps reacts badly and punches the guy in the nose, hoping to get away. The guy tackles him. They roll around on the ground. Your son starts screaming “HELP ME!! HELP ME!!!”

Then there’s a single gunshot, and your 17 year old son is now lying on the wet grass, dead, shot through the heart at close range.

The black man gets up, wipes off his hands, tucks away his gun and hangs out until the police show up, and then explains how he was totally justified in shooting your unarmed 17 year old son – because your son attacked him and he was in fear of his life.

The police totally buy his story, pat him on the back, take him down the local police department, where he’s given a friendly interview and the police simply take his word for what happened and let him go. Yeah, the kid was a thug and probably a drug dealer and the guy did the right thing.

So, as the mother of this 17 year old white kid, an honor student in high school, would you feel that this black man would have been justified in killing him?

I DARE you to say yes. I fucking dare you.

I Got an Email From Nordstrom

As many of you may know, I’ve been tweeting the 14 American retailers (Wal-Mart, Target, Gap, Sears, KMart, J.C. Penney, Nordstrom, Foot Locker, Kohl’s, Macy’s, The North Face, American Eagle Outfitters, The Children’s Place, OshKosh B’Gosh) who have refused to sign the Accord on Fire and Building Safety – which has already been signed by several European manufacturers and retailers.

I’ve been pulling no punches – I have repeatedly tweeted this heart-wrenching picture with tweets like this:

This is what you’re buying at @Nordstrom SIGN THE ACCORD. #Bangladesh pic.twitter.com/htOZUtC4by Pls RT

couple died in a collapse buiding

Today I was contacted by Nordstrom and asked for my contact information. I replied with my email address, and received the following email:

From: “Hodgson, Laura” <Laura.Hodgson@nordstrom.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:01 PM
Subject: Nordstrom response to Bangladesh inquiry
Hi Kate,
I understand from our Social Media team that you were interested in discussing why we decided not to sign onto The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh.  First of all, thank you for contacting us directly.  We greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss this further and directly with our customers.
I am the Director of Social Responsibility for Nordstrom Product Group which is our private-label division which produces apparel, footwear, accessories, cosmetics and home products under a variety of Nordstrom labels.  Nordstrom private-label product makes up a very small portion of the many brands sold at Nordstrom.  The Social Responsibility program was created over 15 years ago and has a dedicated staff, some of whom have been with the program over 11 years, myself included.  Through the creation and evolution of our program we have created protocols and practices that utilize certified, independent third-party monitoring companies to ensure our stringent expectations of suppliers are upheld.
The program is applied globally and includes working with 3 factories in Bangladesh.  We have been deeply saddened by the tragic events in factories in Bangladesh for some time now, well prior to the Rana Plaza collapse.  In fact, we began working with a collective group of companies and industry organizations to improve building and worker safety in January of this year through our participation in the American Apparel and Footwear Association and National Retail Federation.  This working group has formed what is now known as the Safer Factory Initiative (https://www.wewear.org/brands-and-retailers-seek-transparency-and-continued-collaboration-with-bangladesh-government-in-%E2%80%9Csafer-factories-initiative%E2%80%9D/).  This initiative brings together brands, government, unions, factory owners and factory workers to create comprehensive industry standards for factory safety.  It will implement these standards through assessments that focus on electrical wiring, building code compliance, alarm system installation and maintenance, as well as employee awareness training and education.  The education and training of workers is the most immediate goal within the initiative measures and has already begun.
The goal of this working group is to improve the safety of factory workers globally, beginning specifically in Bangladesh, and to ensure their safety in general, not just within the factory walls.  We have come to understand that the concept personal safety and fire safety in particular are not well-addressed in Bangladeshi culture.  As such, we want to ensure our efforts are comprehensive and not limited to just their time on the clock at the factory.
The Safer Factory Initiative is a commitment we have made that requires a financial commitment as well as significant time and effort on behalf of our Social Responsibility staff, agent representatives in Bangladesh, peer companies, factory owners and management, as well as the independent monitors we contract with to carry out on-site assessments.  We have also already identified many independent training organizations for worker training such as WRAP (http://www.wrapcompliance.org/en/fire-safety-training) and worker communication channels such as Labor Voices (http://laborvoices.com/) and Clearvoice (http://www.thecahngroup.com/clearVoice.php) that may be employed to carry out the in-depth training and education we consider critical to ensuring the safety of factory workers immediately.
We have reviewed the Accord thoroughly and believe it is also taking important steps to improve conditions in Bangladeshi factories.  Most of our efforts are aligned and we will continue to monitor the work of the companies involved in the Accord while we continue to move forward with the work we have been focused on through the SFI since January.
These are just a few of the steps that we have taken to ensure that we continue to work with factories that meet our standards to protect the lives and rights of workers in factories that produce Nordstrom labeled product.  I would be happy to answer any additional questions you might have or continue the conversation in general.  Please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
Thank you again for reaching out to us with your concerns and questions.  We take this matter very seriously and are committed to the safety and well-being of the workers in factories with which we contract to manufacture.
Thank you,
Laura Hodgson
NORDSTROM Social Responsibility
phone: 206.373.5431
Well, okay – good for them. They have a “working group” that has been working on building safety and worker training – but they still refuse to sign the Accord. This was my reply:
I appreciate your response, but if you’ll pardon me, it’s “blah-blah-same-old-blah” – and nothing will change.
If this program is doing so much good, why aren’t you publicizing it? If it was worth the time you spent to email me, it ought to be worth the time to let Americans know that you are truly making an effort. People need to know if this is the real deal – or, if you’ll pardon my skepticism, I suspect this is just more of the same-old, same-old lip service – and again, nothing will change. This feels like a lot of hair-splitting and deflecting and disclaimers.
*Something* needs to change. And if this Fire & Bldg Safety Accord is a concrete step in the right direction – for the love of God – sign it and quit trying to find every loophole in order to avoid responsibility and not affect the bottom line. It’s the only decent thing to do.
I told whoever DM’d me that I’m not going to back off on this.
Your customers are well-heeled enough that they can afford to pay a little more for their garments, shoes and accessories.
And here’s the “What’s in it for Nordstrom?”:   Think of the incredible amount of positive publicity it would generate for Nordstrom if your company led the way – and did the right thing for those poor exploited people who make our designer jeans and handbags. If you were to do that, I’d be just as quick to tweet to my 10,000 followers that your company is a leader, has a conscience, is willing to stand up for what is right – instead of prevaricating and smokescreening and tossing out more of the same “blah blah blah.” And Americans, who are at heart decent people, would applaud you.
It’s simple:  Lead the way. Do the right thing. 
We need to take care of each other, and if that means I have to spend a few dollars more on my tee shirts so workers in the 3rd world have enough to eat and they don’t end their wretched lives crushed to death in the rubble of a collapsed factory or burned alive in another factory (this happened in India) where the exits are chained shut – I’m more than willing to do it.
Thanks for taking the time – but it’s not enough.
If you’ll notice, I have left Ms. Hodgson’s contact information in the email. If you feel moved to do so, please feel free to (politely, please!) contact her and let her understand that as much as we all love a bargain, none of  us wants to wear cheap clothing – if it comes drenched in the blood of the poor, wretched people of Bangladesh and other countries.
I’m sure the Accord is not the be-all and end-all perfect answer to the giant problem of worker exploitation in the 3rd World… but – it IS a start.
(My apologies for the tight blocks of text; I have been unable to insert a blank line between paragraphs.)
I received another reply from Ms. Hodgson from Nordstrom:

Hi Kate,

I understand and appreciate your frustration in the lack of information that’s been shared about the comprehensive plan and commitment we’ve made through the Safer Factories Initiative. The Accord has certainly had more attention from a PR standpoint but please be assured that this does not mean that the Safer Factory Initiative is not just as much a concrete step in the right direction.

As a part of the working group, we are also very eager to share more of the detailed plan behind it. We expect that more communication with details of the work to be done will be issued next week. But I want to clarify that we are certainly not participating for publicity – we are participating because we believe there is more that can be done and we support the direction that this initiative has taken.

As I previously mentioned, our commitment of both time and financial resources to the Initiative is focused first and foremost on educating and empowering the workers themselves, as well as partnering with government, unions, factory owners and independent monitoring firms. We’d be glad to share progress with you as time goes on. Also, I shared this link before but please do continue to check in for updates from the working group:https://www.wewear.org/brands-and-retailers-seek-transparency-and-continued-collaboration-with-bangladesh-government-in-“safer-factories-initiative”/.

Thank you again for your concern and questions. We do value the ongoing conversation.

Thank you,

My reply:

“Educating and empowering the workers”…? For what? Not going to work in a factory that’s going to collapse on them? Really?

Laura – I appreciate that you have good intentions, but training the workers just isn’t going to do it. Again, you’ll pardon me, but that’s a whole lot of nothing.

My understanding is that this situation is relatively simple: unscrupulous factory owners are exploiting their workers for profit. Training the workers isn’t going to cut it. Forcing the factory/business owners to provide safe working conditions and decent wages *is* what’s going to cut it.

Please do keep me updated; as of now? I remain unconvinced.


Just Another Afternoon on Twitter

There was a tweet that showed up on my timeline with two people discussing how atheism involves “lazy thinking” and “being vacuous.”

I suppose I should have minded my own damn business, but for those of you who know me… well, I have a bit of trouble with that.

So I tweeted back that, au contraire, being an atheist involves critical thinking, because basically, I’ve learned about other religions, examined the available (non-existent) evidence, and, based on those factors, I made the informed choice not to believe in god.

Predictably, the howling began. I was “angry” and “demanded that others bow to my beliefs.” I was “whining.” I was “trying to prove that (I) am superior to others.”


So, I reminded the two Christians that they were beating me up for being a “lazy” and “vacuous” atheist and that they started it.

I was accused of claiming to “know everything.” Um…no. I didn’t claim that. I was told that I “shouldn’t be so angry.” Um… no, I wasn’t angry, merely pointing out that I didn’t care to be insulted simply for being an atheist. And again, I reminded them that they started it – and that they were now tossing out strawmen along with their insults and logic #FAILs.

Oh, boy. The howling became screeching and gnashing of teeth. I was told that I had “butted in to a private conversation” — a PRIVATE conversation? On freaking TWITTER?? Really?

<facepalm> I really should know better. But…. there’s something so very entertaining about poking holes in puffed-up fools who feel that they are entitled to freely impugn others without consequences.

Plan B

I like to listen to progressive talk radio. There’s a radio show on in the afternoon (while I’m spending quality time with all my freeway friends) hosted by David Cruz on our local prog talk station, KTLK. Normally, I don’t call talk shows for a variety of reasons – they keep you on hold for 20 or 30 or 40 minutes before you get your 30 seconds on the air before they cut you off in mid-word. That’s not my idea of a good time.

Yesterday afternoon, Mr. Cruz was going on about a court ruling by a judge who ruled that the Plan B pill should be available over the counter at pharmacies “without a prescription to all girls of reproductive age, including those younger than 17.” He was horrified by that idea, and used his 15 year old granddaughter as his reason why. He said that our daughters and granddaughters should be able to talk to their parents – rather than be able to simply go to the nearest CVS and buy Plan B. He also opined that parents should be notified.

I vehemently disagree with that opinion. So I called in to his show and tried to get my point across, i.e., that what we really need to do is make sure our teens are educated about sex AND have birth control freely available – because teens are going to have sex, just as the sun comes up every morning. Of course I was cut off in the middle of a sentence, and Mr. Cruz went on to call me a “fatalist” and a “cynic” and implied that I was saying that talking to parents was stupid and unnecessary and that all teens wanted to do was “screw, screw, screw.”

This was totally not what I said. I burned the rest of the way home, and when I flung myself into my chair in front of my computer, I sent Mr. Cruz the following email:

Hi, David – I’m Kate from Santa Monica; we spoke on the air this afternoon with regard to the availability of Plan B.
After our call, as I listened, I realized that you completely misrepresented my point. You called me a cynic and a fatalist – and neither are true. I am a realist. 
I completely agree with you that kids/teens should have loving parents who are involved in their lives. That is a precious gift that I never had. I was beaten and abused and molested by my stepfather. Neither of my parents gave a damn where I was. I had my first boyfriend at 16 – I believed that he was the first person in my life who truly loved me. Of course I had sex with him. Fortunately for me, even as a 16 year old, I was intelligent and well-read enough to protect myself. 16 going on 40, you know?
Girls who have loving, caring parents, David, are NOT the ones who need Plan B. They aren’t the ones who are most at risk of getting pregnant at 15 or 16 or 17. 
Girls who have abusive, alcoholic, uncaring, absent parents ARE the ones who need the protection of Plan B. 
Those girls are the ones who are most likely to look for love and take it wherever they find it, even if it means having sex at 16. If those girls get pregnant, where are they to go? To their abusive parents? All sorts of very bad things happen to those girls (I know – they happened to me); she could end up pregnant and alone on the street – easy prey for pimps and criminals. She could have a back alley abortion and die. She could drink Drano because someone told her that they read on the internet that it would end her pregnancy. Or she could end up as a prostitute, hooked on drugs and pregnant. She could go ahead and have that baby and perhaps it would end up brain damaged from drugs/alcohol or dead at the hands of the girl’s abusive boyfriend – because that kind of abuse perpetuates itself. 
Because abuse is all you know, that’s the kind of man you end up with. It happened to me. I married an abusive man who beat me and threatened to kill me on many occasions. 
These are the girls who need Plan B. They can go to the drugstore, buy the pill, take it and NOT get pregnant – and perhaps survive their miserable childhood – like I did – and go on to make something good out of their lives. 
All this does NOT make me a cynic or a fatalist. It does not mean that I don’t think parents are important – oh, god, they are so very important, and that is something I never had. What this makes me is a woman who is very, very fortunate to have survived my childhood and my marriage who doesn’t want any other teenaged girl to go through what I did. 
Sorry for the long email, but hearing you misrepresent what I said pissed me off. 
That brings me to President Obama. I believe he’s completely wrong on this one, too. This excuse that we don’t know the effects of the morning-after pill on young girls is ridiculous – because we most certainly know the long term effects of pregnancy on young girls.
Women – of all ages – have the right to make their own choices. As it turns out, Mr. Cruz has a daughter who got pregnant at 17. Perhaps if she had had access to Plan B, her life might have gone a different direction. Having a child at 17 is almost guaranteed to destroy any opportunity a girl has to go to college and have a career. If it doesn’t completely destroy a young woman’s opportunities, it most certainly puts huge obstacles in her way.
I am not a fatalist or a cynic. I am a realist – who lived through hell and was lucky to have survived my childhood. So, Mr. Cruz? Remember this: girls who have those wonderful loving parents don’t need Plan B. The girls who had ugly abusive parents like mine are the ones who do need Plan B.

Business is BOOMing in Texas

I posted this cartoon on my Facebook page – twice – last week:





I also posted the accompanying article from the San Francisco Chronicle detailing how Governor Perry is demanding an apology from the cartoonist, Jack Ohman, and the Sacramento Bee, the paper that ran the original cartoon, because he is “disgusted and disappointed” on behalf of the 15 people (mostly first responders and firefighters) who died in the explosion of the ammonium nitrate fertilizer factory in West, Texas. (The article linked here has an excellent run-down on the events at the West Chemical and Fertilizer Company – definitely worth a read.)

Now, I have someone on my Facebook page wagging her finger at me for posting the cartoon that’s upsetting Governor Goodhair. She’s a friend, but she’s lecturing me about how the cartoon is “in bad taste” and blah-blah-blah. I hate being lectured, and wagging your finger in my face is like that cliche about the red flag and the bull. Thus, this post. Perhaps, instead of being annoyed, I should thank my friend for her inspiration.

Is this cartoon in bad taste?

Sure. Of course it is. But, as far as I’m concerned, it’s in much worse taste to allow the owners of that factory to do whatever-the-hell they wanted and violate all kinds of safety regulations – which are in place – DUH – to keep people safe from rapacious and unscrupulous business owners who are willing to cut every corner and take every shortcut (even if it kills people – they can be replaced easily and cheaply, right?) to maximize their profits.

Political cartoons, satires, op-eds – anything that calls out hypocrisy, stupidity, dangerous behavior and/or a complete disregard for the safety of your fellow human beings is very often in bad taste. Those things, by their very nature, are in bad taste – and they need to be, in order to hammer home the point.

Governor Perry has repeatedly bragged about how great a place Texas is to do business; he’s even called it the “Texas Miracle.” “C’mon over to Texas, boys! We’ll keep the gubmint’s nose outcher bidness – you do whatever you want and make BIG profits! And – you can even squirrel your money away in your offshore accounts – we got low taxes here – if you’re rich, o’course!” Texas is one of only seven states in the US that does not have a state income tax on personal income – and don’t those big corporate guys love their accountants – who can magically make millions of dollars in profit vanish into thin air, courtesy of our federal tax code (which overwhelmingly favors the rich).

Yeah, it’s a miracle, all right. What Rick Perry’s “Texas Miracle” basically means is, that if you want to make bombs or ammunition or refine gasoline or make ammonium nitrate fertilizer, you don’t have to provide a safe workplace, follow safety procedures to handle dangerous materials, and you can zone a factory handling dangerous materials right smack in the middle of a residential neighborhood (keeps your workers conveniently close by, you know?). You can flip OSHA the bird – just like the owners of the West Chemical and Fertilizer Company did:  the last full safety inspection of that plant was conducted in 1985. Do the math. You can simply ignore the Department of Homeland Security’s rule that they must be notified if your business stores or uses more than a certain quantity of dangerous materials – the folks at West Chemical and Fertilizer Company did just that. And a $6000 fine? Eh. Just another cost of doing business – which can most likely be written off as some sort of business expense when April 15th rolls around.

In my opinion (which is what this blog is all about, right?) if Governor Rick Perry wants to brag about how Texas is the place with low taxes and few regulations, he needs to be called out.

Why? Because when you go up the chain of responsibility, ultimately, it’s his fault those people died.

And if now’s not the time to call him out on it…when IS the time?

Don’t think I’m not sorry for those poor people in West, TX. They have suffered and are suffering terribly, and my heart goes out to them.

…But how much do you want to bet that the vast majority of them voted for Rick Perry and Mitt Romney? It may sound heartless, but the people of West, Texas have learned, in the hardest way possible, that elections DO have consequences. “Small government” and “lower taxes” sounds really good on paper – but when you live next door to a fertilizer factory which is essentially a giant bomb?

Not so much.

Three Categories

My friends and I fall into three categories these days:  1) those who are pissed off at President Obama for offering up Social Security (via the chained CPI) to the hostage-taking terrorist lunatics with the teabags hanging from their hats that make up the GOP as a “pre-emptive compromise,” 2) those who are convinced that the president is playing a sly three-dimensional game of chess while the room-temperature-IQ Tea Partiers are fumbling around with their tiddlywinks, and 3) those who are dazed, worn-out and confused.

How do I categorize myself? For me, it’s “all of the above.”

 I’d (of course) have to turn in my lefty socialist union thug card if I wasn’t pissed at the president for offering up our Social Security as a “pre-emptive compromise.” Who the hell does that?! If I’m going to negotiate on the price of a must-have treasure I find at a flea market, I’m sure as hell not going to offer the seller a higher amount than what’s written on the price tag as a “pre-emptive compromise”! Hell, no. I’m going to start out with a lowball offer and work my way up to the highest price I’m willing to pay – if I wanted to pay full price, I would simply hand over my cash and walk away with my treasure clutched firmly in my hot little hands. And vice-versa, if I’m negotiating with my employer for a raise or with a new employer for my salary, I’m going to figure out what I want, keep that number in my head – and add a chunk to it so I can be bargained down to the number I want. And yes, there’s always the chance I might be offered the higher amount, and that’s all good. So yeah, I guess I belong in group 1, people who are pissed off at President Obama for offering up Social Security to the hostage-takers in the GOP.

But then again, over the last four years, I have also watched President Obama outmaneuver and literally run rings around those dumb dopes in the GOP – administering beating after beating and forcing the Republicans to do really stupid things – like demand that the rich get to keep their tax break for their private jets (really, Republicans?), attempt to tie food assistance for poor children to their grades in school, and all sorts of other shoot-yourself-in-the-foot kinds of things. So? That means I also fall into group 2, those who are convinced that the president is playing three-dimensional chess while the drooling gomers in the GOP are forming up the circular firing squad.Image

That leaves group 3:  the confused, the dazed and the exhausted. And yes, I fall squarely into this group as well. First of all, I’m on outrage overload; after more than a decade of appalling bigotry, idiocy, ignorance, the insulting invasions of my body the Republicans are trying to sign into law, their attempts to strip Americans of their rights – the right to vote, the right to form a union, etc., coupled with the war crimes of the Bush administration and the detestable antics of the most embarrassing Supreme Court in our history…? My circuits are fried, and my irony meter exploded a long time ago.

We progressives end up going through this same stress every time President Obama ladles out one of his generous dollops of booty in the form of offering cuts to Medicare, cuts to food assistance, cuts to …whatever…  in order to appease the GOP – you know, that “pre-emptive compromise” thing? I definitely give a damn, because of course, my reaction to every single one of the president’s “pre-emptive compromise” thingies is to be completely pissed off, and I invariably find myself nodding vigorously along with the always-predictable outrage of my heroes, folks like Bernie Sanders, Paul Krugman, Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow (even though she’s so very nice – even when she’s outraged).

Like Forrest Gump, I’m kinda tired. So, if the president is playing that very deep game of 3-dimensional chess, I wish he’d find a way to let us know – a secret password or maybe a Barack-signal.