I keep seeing idiot conservatives raging about the poor and the unemployed being “moochers” and “takers” straight out of Ayn Rand’s novel “Atlas Shrugged.” The thing is, I’ve *read* Atlas Shrugged at least twice, and I am struck by the way the current crop of teabag congresscritters sound just like the moochers and takers from the government in Ayn’s book.
They demanded that they be taken anywhere, that they be obeyed instantly – and they never bother to think about who was actually doing the work to get them places and make their wishes come true. In other words, these moochers and takers demanded that the people make bricks without straw.
One particular scene sticks in my head. It’s a group of government officials who demand to be transported by railroad across the continent. They approach a long tunnel in the Colorado Rockies, and are informed by the engineer that because there is only one viable modern locomotive left on the entire railroad network, their train is going to be sidelined because the locomotive pulling it is a coal-fired steam engine – and it would not be safe to use that engine to travel through such a long tunnel, due to a buildup of gases.
The government moochers angrily DEMAND that they be taken through the tunnel AT ONCE. They threaten the engineer and the engine crew with firings and/or jail time. They exclaim that they paid for the ticket, therefore they MUST be taken to their destination – regardless of whether or not it’s safe. They tell the engineer that getting them through the tunnel is his problem, and that he had better solve it toot sweet or heads will roll.
The engineer and the crew do the only sensible thing: they desert the train and disappear. A loud and drunken coal shoveler tells the government officials that HE can drive the train safely through the tunnel, so he stokes the coal fire, and drives the engine into the tunnel… and, of course, the very thing the engineer predicted happens: the engine explodes, killing everyone on the train and destroying the tunnel.
Now, let’s jump to the present, in the real world in Washington, D.C. Think about this: Rand Paul earnestly telling us that giving the long-term unemployed a paltry check in the way of unemployment insurance is “disincentivizing” them to find work. He tells us that we’d actually be doing them a favor if we cut off their unemployment benefits.
How are these people to live? That’s their problem. They got themselves into this situation – they need to pull up their bootstraps and get themselves out of it.
Same with the other mooch—er, “government officials” who shake their heads solemnly and tell us that the poor are lazy, and that if we cut off their welfare checks and take away their SNAP benefits, they’ll be much more motivated to find a job and get out of poverty, instead of lounging in that comfy government-provided hammock.
Again, how are they to find work if they end up homeless? That’s their problem, say the teabaggers in Congress.
My question to you:
In light of the above, who are the REAL moochers in this country? The poor and the unemployed, who are desperately scrabbling for the means to keep a roof over their heads and feed their families – or the smug Tea Party/Republicans in the House and the Senate, who make a 6-figure salary – and work fewer than 100 days out of the year?